|
Summary:
Read Full Review
Pros:
-Interior Space
-Interior Versatility
-Pricing
-Available AWD
Cons:
-Ride Comfort
-Refinement
-Agility
-Acceleration
-Fuel Economy
Overall:
The Caliber has its strong points, but falls short of some
very similar competitors.
Recommended Alternatives:
-Chrysler PT Cruiser
-Ford Focus ZXW
-Kia Spectra5
-Pontiac Vibe
-Scion xB
-Suzuki Aerio SX
-Toyota Matrix
Evaluations:
Interior Comfort: 7/10
Interior Quality: 5/10
Versatility: 7/10
Refinement: 3/10
Fun-to-Drive: 3/10
Fuel Economy: 4/10
Safety: Unknown
Price: 6/10
Overall Rating: 5/10
Recommended: No
Read Full Review
|
|
|
|
The
Basics:
|
Pricing:
Models/Base Price (MSRP):
SE: $13,425
SXT: $15,425
R/T AWD: $19,425
Current rebate: $500
Destination Charge: $560
|
|
Dimensions:
Length: 173.8 inches
Width: 68.8 inches
Height: 60.4 inches
Wheelbase: 103.7 inches
Weight: 2966-3308 lbs
Cargo Space Behind Rear Seat: 18.5 cubic feet
Maximum Cargo Space: 48.0 cubic feet
|
|
Powertrains:
|
1.8-liter I4:
Standard on: SE, SXT
Optional on: NA
Standard Transmission: 5-speed
manual
Optional Transmission: NA
Horsepower: 148
Torque: 125 lb/ft
EPA City Mileage: 28 mpg manual
EPA Highway Mileage: 32 mpg manual
EPA Overall Mileage: 30 mpg manual
|
|
2.0-liter I4:
Standard on: NA
Optional on: SE, SXT
Standard Transmission: CVT
Optional Transmission: NA
Horsepower: 158
Torque: 141 lb/ft
EPA City Mileage: 26 mpg CVT
EPA Highway Mileage: 30 mpg CVT
EPA Overall Mileage: 28 mpg CVT
|
|
2.4-liter I4:
Standard on: R/T AWD
Optional on: NA
Standard Transmission: CVT
Optional Transmission: NA
Horsepower: 172
Torque: 165 lb/ft
EPA City Mileage: 23 mpg CVT
EPA Highway Mileage: 26 mpg CVT
EPA Overall Mileage: 24 mpg CVT
|
|
|
Safety
Ratings:
NHTSA Frontal Crash Test, Driver: 5/5 Stars
Front Passenger: 5/5 Stars
NHTSA Side Crash Test, Driver: Not Tested
Front Passenger: Not Tested
NHTSA Rollover Resistance: Not Tested
IIHS Offset Crash Test: Not Tested
IIHS Side Crash Test: Not Tested
IIHS Head Restraint: Not Tested
|
The Caliber is currently popular
for its combination of a lower price and better fuel economy .
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|