Comparison Test: Inexpensive Family Sedans
 

Introduction
Vehicle Details

25th Place

24th Place

23rd Place

22nd Place

21st Place

20th Place
19th Place
18th Place
17th Place

16th Place

15th Place

14th Place

13th Place

12th Place

11th Place

10th Place

9th Place

8th Place

7th Place

6th Place

5th Place

4th Place

3rd Place

2nd Place

1st Place

Evaluations
 

 

14th Place: Ford Fusion 3.0

The Fusion was just introduced for 2006 to help replace the Taurus. And that is part of the problem, its bold styling and relative newness keep it selling closer to its sticker price than most of the other cars in this group. As such, the V6 version was rather expensive by this group’s standards and came without many features. But otherwise, it is a very nice vehicle. It is roomy inside, and the interior is very well-finished. It also rides and handles very well. But the V6 option, included on this vehicle, adds $2,700 to the price of a comparable 4-cylinder model, and is neither the most powerful nor the most refined even against only the competitors within this group, and gas mileage suffers greatly over the standard 4-cylinder.

 

The Fusion rides comfortably. The ride is absorbent, and is generally well-controlled, though it doesn’t always recover quickly after passing bumps. The car handles quite well for a family sedan, and the accurate steering returns good feedback. Body roll is more pronounced than in the Fusion’s sport-focused cousin, the Mazda6, and it doesn’t feel nearly as nimble in fast cornering, but it also rides more comfortably. The 3.0-liter V6 has more than enough power to outgun the other cars in this group that come equipped with 4-cylinders, but the Fusion’s acceleration isn’t up to the level of the better V6-equipped cars here. The engine is somewhat noisy under hard acceleration, and road noise can be excessive. Gas mileage is adequate for a V6 midsize sedan, but opting for the standard 4-cylinder represents a significant improvement in that area.

 

Inside, the Fusion has high, firm, comfortable, and well-shaped front seats with impressive leg and head space. The rear is mounted high for good thigh support, but isn’t as roomy as some competitors’, and isn’t angled properly to make maximum use of the available space. The interior uses high-quality materials that fit together well. The gauges are clear enough but could be larger, and while the instruments are well-placed, there was no reason to have replaced knob-style controls with annoying-to-use buttons. The high seats and fairly high roof ease entry/exit. Drivers sit very comfortably, and have very good visibility. The trunk is reasonably well-shaped, but not particularly large.

 

The Fusion earned four stars for both the driver and for the front passenger in the NHTSA frontal crash test, a mediocre score for a new design, but has yet to be subjected to any other crash tests.

 

The Fusion reviewed here came in at $20,918, not very well-equipped. That price does include the standard power driver’s seat and optional side airbag system that includes both torso-protecting and curtain-style head-protecting side airbags, but little else. The optional antilock brakes with traction control would have pushed the price too high, as would the sunroof, leather, or 6-disc CD changer. Heated seats and automatic climate control are only offered on a higher-end version of the car, and stability control isn’t offered at all.

 

Overall, the Fusion is a very nice car with good ride and handling and interior comfort and quality. But the V6 doesn’t provide sufficient performance or refinement advantages over the standard 4-cylinder to justify its $2,700 cost, and the difference in gas mileage between the two engines is more than in many competing vehicles. If you want a Fusion, and there are many reasons to, go for the standard engine.

 

 

The Basics:

 

 Vehicle Reviewed:

 2006 Ford Fusion

 SE

 3.0-liter V6 (221 hp)

 6-speed automatic

 $20,918

 

  Pros:

-Agility

-Ride Comfort

-Interior Comfort

-Acceleration

 

 Cons:

-Features for the Money

-Gas Mileage

-Ergonomics

 

Overall:

The 4-cylinder version is almost as good as this excellent vehicle for much less money, look there first.     

IFCAR Home

Reviews

Pricing

Other Sources

Top Picks

Vehicle Info

About IFCAR

Contact IFCAR

© 2005, Institute For Consumer Automotive Research