Comparison Test: Inexpensive Family Sedans
 

Introduction
Vehicle Details

25th Place

24th Place

23rd Place

22nd Place

21st Place

20th Place
19th Place
18th Place
17th Place

16th Place

15th Place

14th Place

13th Place

12th Place

11th Place

10th Place

9th Place

8th Place

7th Place

6th Place

5th Place

4th Place

3rd Place

2nd Place

1st Place

Evaluations
 

 

15th Place: Pontiac G6 3.5

The G6’s available 3.5-liter V6 is a vast improvement over the standard 2.4-liter 4-cylinder, with far superior acceleration and refinement for only around $900 more. However, neither G6 is a great car. The V6 lives up to the car’s sporty styling with quicker acceleration, but the car is still neither fun to drive nor roomy inside, still has a stiff ride, and still has mediocre interior quality.

 

The G6 has a stiff, uncomfortable ride that is unsettled over uneven pavement and not absorbent. Despite this, the G6 is not particularly agile. It performs capably in fast cornering, but it doesn’t feel nimble or fun to drive. Body roll is at least well-contained. The numb, overly-light, and rather vague steering further hinders the driving experience. The car accelerates very well with its V6, which provides impressive power at all speeds. It is not exactly quiet, however, and road noise is excessive. The V6’s gas mileage beats even most 4-cylinders in this group.

 

Inside, the G6 has very comfortable and supportive front seats, though they are too soft. The rear is too hard, and though the seat is reasonably well-shaped, headroom is insufficient for taller drivers, limited by the car’s sloping roofline. The interior uses too many hard, cheap plastics on the center stack, and some trim pieces don’t fit well throughout the interior. The red-lit gauges are clear, but some instruments could use additional contrast. The front seat’s bolsters improve seat comfort but are a slight obstacle to getting in and out, and the sloping roof requires care when accessing the rear. Drivers sit comfortably enough, and the coupelike styling doesn’t interfere with rearward visibility as one might expect. The trunk is small by this group’s standards, and it is somewhat narrow as well.

 

The G6 did very well in crash testing. It earned five stars for the driver and four for the front passenger in the NHTSA frontal crash test, and five stars for both the driver and for the rear passenger in the NHTSA side crash test. The IIHS has not tested the G6, but the Chevrolet Malibu with which it shares its platform did very well in their offset and side test. 

 

The G6 3.5-liter reviewed here came in at $20,095, identically equipped to the 4-cylinder version. Both came with a sunroof, a 6-disc CD changer, an OnStar emergency notification system, antilock brakes with traction control, torso and curtain-style head-protecting side airbags, a remote starting system, XM satellite radio, and power-adjustable pedals, among other items. Leather and power seats (except for a height-adjuster) are only available on higher-end versions, and stability control isn’t offered at all. But both G6s come very well-equipped for the money.

 

Overall, 3.5-liter V6 is well worth the $900 price premium over the 2.4-liter 4-cylinder for its significant improvements in power and refinement with a negligible gas mileage penalty. But neither car stands out in this class, with a stiff ride, cramped rear seating, mediocre interior quality, and lifeless steering. There are better choices, including the Chevrolet Malibu, which is essentially the same car with practical rather than sporty styling.

 

 

The Basics:

 

 Vehicle Reviewed:

 2006 Pontiac G6

 Base

 3.5-liter V6 (201 hp)

 4-speed automatic

 $20,099

 

  Pros:

-Features for the Money

-Acceleration

-Fuel Economy

  

 Cons:

-Ride Comfort

-Interior Space

-Interior Quality

-Entry/Exit

-Trunk Space

-Steering Feel

 

Overall:

With its available 3.5-liter V6, the G6 has more power, but still makes unnecessary sacrifices for its perception of sport.     

IFCAR Home

Reviews

Pricing

Other Sources

Top Picks

Vehicle Info

About IFCAR

Contact IFCAR

© 2005, Institute For Consumer Automotive Research