Comparison Test: Inexpensive Family Sedans
 

Introduction
Vehicle Details

25th Place

24th Place

23rd Place

22nd Place

21st Place

20th Place
19th Place
18th Place
17th Place

16th Place

15th Place

14th Place

13th Place

12th Place

11th Place

10th Place

9th Place

8th Place

7th Place

6th Place

5th Place

4th Place

3rd Place

2nd Place

1st Place

Evaluations
 

 

17th Place: Pontiac G6 2.4

The G6, like the Pontiac Grand Prix, is a standard family sedan hidden inside sporty styling that compromises its utility. It is based on the more practical and comfortable Chevrolet Malibu, and shares that vehicle’s driving experience except for coming with a larger standard 4-cylinder engine. While this G6 outscored the 4-cylinder Malibu because of its lower price, its Chevrolet relative is a generally superior vehicle. There are still better choices that do not sacrifice their practicality for sporty styling, and there are those that follow through with their look’s promise to deliver actual driving enjoyment. Even at this price point, the G6 falls short.

 

The G6 has a stiff, uncomfortable ride that is unsettled over uneven pavement and not absorbent. Despite this, the G6 is not particularly agile. It performs capably in fast cornering, but it doesn’t feel nimble or fun to drive. Body roll is at least well-contained. The numb, overly-light, and rather vague steering further hinders the driving experience. The standard 4-cylinder engine is overwhelmed in this car, unable to provide strong acceleration. Its engine note is much rough and loud, and is noticeable in more than just acceleration. Road noise is excessive as well. This 4-cylinder at least returns excellent gas mileage.

 

Inside, the G6 has very comfortable and supportive front seats, though they are too soft. The rear is too hard, and though the seat is reasonably well-shaped, headroom is insufficient for taller drivers, limited by the car’s sloping roofline. The interior uses too many hard, cheap plastics on the center stack, and some trim pieces don’t fit well throughout the interior. The red-lit gauges are clear, but some instruments could use additional contrast. The front seat’s bolsters improve seat comfort but are a slight obstacle to getting in and out, and the sloping roof requires care when accessing the rear. Drivers sit comfortably enough, and the coupelike styling doesn’t interfere with rearward visibility as one might expect. The trunk is small by this group’s standards, and it is somewhat narrow as well.

 

The G6 did very well in crash testing. It earned five stars for the driver and four for the front passenger in the NHTSA frontal crash test, and five stars for both the driver and for the rear passenger in the NHTSA side crash test. The IIHS has not tested the G6, but the Chevrolet Malibu with which it shares its platform did very well in their offset and side test. 

 

The G6 4-cylinder reviewed here came in at $19,199. It came with a sunroof, a 6-disc CD changer, an OnStar emergency notification system, antilock brakes with traction control, torso and curtain-style head-protecting side airbags, a remote starting system, XM satellite radio, and power-adjustable pedals, among other items. Leather and power seats (except for a height-adjuster) aren’t available on 4-cylinder G6 models and stability control isn’t offered at all. But the G6 still came very well-equipped for the money.

 

Overall, the G6 makes sacrifices for its sporty perception, but is still slow and no more fun to drive than most competing family sedans. There are better choices, including the V6 version that is only around $900 more.

 

 

The Basics:

 

 Vehicle Reviewed:

 2006 Pontiac G6

 Base

 2.4-liter I4 (167 hp)

 4-speed automatic

 $19,199

 

  Pros:

-Features for the Money

-Fuel Economy

 

 Cons:

-Ride Comfort

-Interior Space

-Steering Feel

-Interior Quality

-Trunk Space

-Entry/Exit

 

 Overall:

Style over substance at a reasonable price.      

IFCAR Home

Reviews

Pricing

Other Sources

Top Picks

Vehicle Info

About IFCAR

Contact IFCAR

© 2005, Institute For Consumer Automotive Research