Comparison Test: Inexpensive Family Sedans
 

Introduction
Vehicle Details

25th Place

24th Place

23rd Place

22nd Place

21st Place

20th Place
19th Place
18th Place
17th Place

16th Place

15th Place

14th Place

13th Place

12th Place

11th Place

10th Place

9th Place

8th Place

7th Place

6th Place

5th Place

4th Place

3rd Place

2nd Place

1st Place

Evaluations
 

 

 

22nd Place: Suzuki Verona

The Verona looks impressive on paper, with low prices, clean styling, a roomy interior, and a standard 6-cylinder engine. Even under closer evaluation it looks like an adequate car, with a decent ride and reasonable interior quality. But it falls short under closer evaluation. It handles clumsily, and even with the 6-cylinder engine the Verona is slower than most competing 4-cylinders, while still returning 6-cylinder fuel economy. And while it does most other things adequately, most of the others here do those things even better. The Verona is inexpensive and adequate in most ways, but that’s not enough anymore.

 

The Verona has a soft, fairly comfortable ride, but it gets floaty on the highway, and recovers slowly from bumps. In the cheapest cars, a soft ride tends to bring about soft handling, and the Verona is no exception. It feels rather clumsy, with pronounced body roll and lifeless steering, though at least never unsafe. As noted, the standard 2.5-liter I6 provides acceleration barely on par with a below-average 4-cylinder competitor, lacking in off-the-line and in passing power. It is quiet enough in most circumstances, but whines under acceleration. Wind and road noises are capably suppressed. Fuel economy is mediocre even for a 6-cylinder car.

 

Inside, the rather narrow front seats too soft and have a short cushion. The rear is roomy enough, but the seat is too low, which helps headroom but hurts thigh support. The dash is constructed of solid-fitting materials, most of which are of reasonable quality. Some instruments are too small, and the gauges wash out easily. Entry/exit is complicated by the low roof. Drivers sit either too far from the pedals or too close to the steering wheel; neither a telescoping wheel nor adjustable pedals are offered. The trunk is small.

 

The Verona did not excel in crash testing. It was rated a mediocre three stars for the driver and four for the front passenger in the NHTSA frontal crash test, and four for the driver and three for the rear passenger in the NHTSA side crash test. The car was Acceptable in the IIHS offset crash test, and Marginal (only the second highest of the five ratings) in the IIHS side crash test. Its head restraints were rated Poor.

 

The Verona reviewed here came with the only available option (traction control) for only $20,136. That price includes heated power leather seats, torso-protecting side airbags, antilock brakes, a sunroof, and automatic climate control. Missing from the options list are stability control and a CD changer, but the car is very well-equipped for the money overall. 

 

Overall, the Verona is a decent car when viewed in exclusion from its competitors. But their superior comfort, power, fuel economy, and driving dynamics clarify exactly why this Suzuki costs so much less. It’s not a terrible car, but its competitors are just too much better.

  

 

The Basics:

 

 Vehicle Reviewed:

 2006 Suzuki Verona

 Luxury

 2.5-liter I6 (155 hp)

 4-speed automatic

 $20,136

 

  Pros:

-Features for the Money

 

 Cons:

-Agility

-Acceleration

-Fuel Economy

-Safety Ratings

 

 Overall:

Depending on your standards, it is either generally competent or generally mediocre. But in neither case is it a compelling family sedan choice.  

IFCAR Home

Reviews

Pricing

Other Sources

Top Picks

Vehicle Info

About IFCAR

Contact IFCAR

© 2005, Institute For Consumer Automotive Research