Comparison Test: Compact Wagons  
 

Introduction

Vehicle Details

13th Place

12th Place

11th Place

10th Place

9th Place

8th Place

7th Place

6th Place

5th Place

4th Place

3rd Place

2nd Place

1st Place
Evaluations


 

 

11th Place: Chrysler PT Cruiser

 

 The PT Cruiser is something like what the Dodge Caliber will be like once it has been on the market already for six years. It has seen steep rebates and drastic price reductions in recent years, and unlike the Caliber, it was a strong wagon competitor when it was introduced for the 2001 model year. It still has better seats and more cargo space than the newer Caliber, and rides and handles better. But age has still hurt this retro-styled wagon. Despite a recent update, problems remain with the interior’s quality and instrument layout. The standard 2.4-liter I4 is noisy, slow, and fuel-thirsty, especially with the automatic transmission. And it still costs over $17,000, a price point at which competitors can be found without such issues.

 

The PT Cruiser has a reasonably comfortable and absorbent ride, but it is prone to excessive motions at high speeds. It handles adequately well, but the steering is slow to respond and feels numb. The standard 2.4-liter I4 provides mediocre acceleration and is quite weak during high-speed passing. (Two turbocharged versions of the engine are available at higher price points, and rectify this shortcoming.) The standard engine is also noisy and harsh-sounding under acceleration, and isn’t especially quiet at cruise either. Wind and road noise are also excessive. Fuel economy is poor by this group’s standards.

 

Inside, the PT Cruiser has high, firm front seats that could use longer cushions. The rear is quite roomy as well, and the seats are high there as well, but the seat is a bit flat and loses some support over time. The interior is generally well-constructed, but features expanses of low-grade plastic. The gauges could use more contrast, and the dash-mounted power window controls are awkward to use, but the instrument layout is otherwise logical. Taller drivers will want either more rearward seat travel or a telescoping steering wheel, but will have abundant head room despite the high seat. Cargo space is plentiful and the cargo area is well-shaped. The PT Cruiser is also especially versatile in dealing with cargo; a well-designed parcel shelf can be adjusted to multiple positions or can be easily removed, the rear seats can be either folded, tumbled, or removed depending on the preferences of convenience or cargo (such selection is rare; in most of the others here the rear seats simply plop down to create a flat or semi-flat floor), and the front seat can fold flat.

 

The PT Cruiser earned four stars for both the driver and for the front passenger in the NHTSA frontal crash test, and four stars for the driver and five for the rear passenger in the NHTSA side crash test with side airbags that are standard on high-end versions and optional on the lower versions. The IIHS has not tested the PT Cruiser.

 

The PT Cruiser reviewed here came in at $17,049. At that price, it lacked curtain-style side airbags (unavailable on the PT Cruiser) but was otherwise adequately equipped.

 

Overall, the PT Cruiser still has strengths, specifically its roomy and comfortable seats and its large and versatile cargo area. But its powertrain never impressed even when the PT Cruiser was a new design, the interior lacks polish compared to newer competitors, and the ride and handling could be better. And considering that the PT Cruiser is not inexpensive, there are better choices.

 

NEXT PAGE

 

 

The Basics:

 

 Vehicle Reviewed:

 2006 Chrysler PT Cruiser

 Touring

 2.4-liter I4 (150 hp)

 4-speed automatic

 $17,049

 

  Pros:

-Interior Comfort

-Cargo Space

-Cargo Versatility

 

 Cons:

-Fuel Economy

-Steering Feel

-Interior Quality

-Refinement

-Acceleration

-Ergonomics

 

 Overall:

A competent overall vehicle that isn’t inexpensive enough to compensate for its flaws.            

  

IFCAR Home

Reviews

Pricing

Other Sources

Top Picks

Vehicle Info

About IFCAR

Contact IFCAR

© 2006, Institute For Consumer Automotive Research