Comparison Test: Compact Wagons  
 

Introduction

Vehicle Details

13th Place

12th Place

11th Place

10th Place

9th Place

8th Place

7th Place

6th Place

5th Place

4th Place

3rd Place

2nd Place

1st Place
Evaluations


 

 

2nd Place: Mazda5

 

Don’t let its appearance fool you, the Mazda5 is not a true minivan (see the IFCAR economy van comparison for a detailed explanation). Aside from the sliding doors and (tiny but class-exclusive) third row seat, the 5 is similar to the others in this group for being a tall hatchback/wagon based on a compact sedan (in its case, the Mazda3.) It has a roomy and high-quality interior for four adults and good ride and handling. It is the best family car in this group for its versatility in hauling people and cargo, and general competence. But consider the price tag that reaches past $18,000 to make the 5 one of the most expensive vehicles in this group, and it’s not for everyone.

 

The Mazda5 has a rather firm ride, but it is very well-controlled and still reasonably absorbent. The 5 handles reasonably well for a small wagon, but it doesn’t stand out here as it does against true minivans. The steering is accurate, responsive, and reasonably communicative, making it more enjoyable to drive than some of the sharper-handling cars in this group. The 2.3-liter I4, the only engine offered, does not provide strong acceleration, especially during highway-speed passing, and would probably run into problems with passengers in all six seats. The engine gets noisy under acceleration, and road noise is also noticeable. The Mazda5 isn’t even as fuel-efficient as some larger V6-powered minivans, and tied for last place in this group in that area.

 

Inside, the Mazda5’s front seats are high, well-shaped, and comfortable, but too firm. The second row of seats is a pair of buckets rather than a three-person bench like all the others, and they adjust fore and aft . Optimally adjusted, the high, firm seats are quite roomy and comfortable. The low, cramped third row only has enough room for adults to physically fit when the second-row seats are adjusted to sacrifice that row’s leg space. Of course, the fact that the third row is offered at all is in the Mazda5’s favor, and it’s certainly more useful to have than not. The interior uses high-quality materials that fit together very well. The gauges are clear, and the instruments are logically placed, appropriately sized, and quite easy to use. Entry/exit is very easy to the first two rows. The second-row seats flip forward for third-row access, but the lack of space still makes it difficult. Drivers sit high and comfortably, aided by the standard tilt and telescoping steering wheel, but rearward visibility is obstructed by thick roof pillars. Though Mazda did not release technical specifications, there seems to be as much cargo space behind the third row seat as some of the others here behind their rearmost (second row) seats, and it folds flat easily to expand the space (though folding the third seat limits the 5 to four passengers, as opposed to five in all of the others’ two rows). The second-row seats also fold flat easily, and open up a large and usefully-shaped cargo hold by wagon, if not by minivan standards.

 

The Mazda5 has not been crash-tested by either the IIHS or by NHTSA.

 

The Mazda5 reviewed here came in at $18,196, well-equipped. At that price, it is well-equipped with all the expected features for this class as well as alloy wheels.

 

Overall, the Mazda5 offers excellent versatility in carrying people and cargo, rides and handles well, and has a high-quality interior. It’s not powerful or fuel-efficient, and it’s rather expensive, but it’s the best family car in this group, and unlike most of the others here, it is a legitimate alternative to a larger vehicle.

 

NEXT PAGE

 

 

The Basics:

 

 Vehicle Reviewed:

 2006 Mazda5

 Sport

 2.3-liter I4 (157 hp)

 4-speed automatic

 $18,196

 

  Pros:

-Interior Versatility

-Interior Space

-Interior Comfort

-Interior Quality

-Ergonomics

-Agility

-Cargo Space

-Ride Comfort

 

 Cons:

-Price

-Fuel Economy

 

 Overall:

A very good blend of some minivan and small-wagon virtues at a rather high price for this group.      

            

  

IFCAR Home

Reviews

Pricing

Other Sources

Top Picks

Vehicle Info

About IFCAR

Contact IFCAR

© 2006, Institute For Consumer Automotive Research