Comparison Test: Economy Sedans  
 

Introduction

Vehicle Details

17th Place

16th Place

15th Place

14th Place

13th Place

12th Place

11th Place

10th Place

9th Place

8th Place

7th Place

6th Place

5th Place

4th Place

3rd Place

2nd Place

1st Place
Evaluations


 

 

14th Place: Chevrolet Cobalt

  

The Cobalt, which shares its mechanicals with the last-place Saturn Ion, is a relatively new design that never stacked up especially well in its class. A tiny rear seat, numb steering, and mediocre gas mileage hurt it as much as does its generally acceptable but rarely outstanding all-around performance. It does offer an especially peppy engine for this class, and a comfortable and reasonably quiet ride, but you can still do better.

 

The Cobalt has a very smooth, stable, absorbent, and overall comfortable ride. The car handles well, feeling reasonably agile and controlling body roll quite well, but the steering is too light and lacks feedback. The 2.2-liter 4-cylinder provides prompt acceleration, never feeling taxed in passing or even fully loaded, impressive for a small car. The car is very quiet except under acceleration, where engine noise appears quickly and very noticeably. Fuel economy is reasonable if you consider the car’s excellent acceleration.

 

Inside, the Cobalt’s front seats are roomy but too hard and thinly-padded, and not well-shaped. The rear lacks leg and foot space, the cushion is too low and hard, and the seatback is too upright. The interior is mostly well-assembled, but a few cheap-feeling plastics detract from the overall positive impression of quality it provides. The gauges are very clear, but some instruments are mounted too low. Drivers sit low, but have good visibility and more fore-aft seat travel than most competitors. Wide door openings can’t compensate for the low seats or small rear footwells to sufficiently ease entry/exit. The trunk is roomy and well-shaped, but it would benefit from a larger opening.

 

The Cobalt reviewed here came in at $16,153, very well-equipped. At that price, it includes all the expected equipment in this group, as well as automatic headlights, an MP3 player, and a remote start system. Unlike on the Saturn Ion, GM’s OnStar system is not standard, but a $700 option (not equipped on the vehicle reviewed).

 

Overall, the Cobalt has its strong points. It rides comfortably, is more powerful than the competition, did reasonably well in crash testing, and comes well-equipped for an acceptable price. But the competition is strong enough for that to be insufficient in this class. Other cars are much roomier and more comfortable inside, get better gas mileage, are much more fun to drive, and cost less. Look to them first.

 

NEXT PAGE

 

 

The Basics:

 

 Vehicle Reviewed:

 2007 Chevrolet Cobalt 2LT

 2.2-liter I4 (148 hp)

 4-speed automatic

 $16,153

 

  Pros:

-Acceleration

-Ride

-Trunk Space

-Price

 

 Cons:

-Interior Space

-Interior Comfort

-Fuel Economy

 

 Overall: 5/10

The Cobalt has its strong points, but others have the same ones without this car's flaws.

  

IFCAR Home

Reviews

Pricing

Other Sources

Top Picks

Vehicle Info

About IFCAR

Contact IFCAR

© 2007, Institute For Consumer Automotive Research