Comparison Test: Inexpensive Family Sedans  
 

Introduction

Vehicle Details

25th Place

24th Place

23rd Place

22nd Place

21st Place

20th Place

19th Place

18th Place

17th Place

16th Place

15th Place

14th Place

13th Place

12th Place

11th Place

10th Place

9th Place

8th Place

7th Place

6th Place

5th Place

4th Place

3rd Place

1st Place
Evaluations


 

 

15th Place: Chevrolet Impala

  

The Impala is mechanically related to the 16th-place Buick LaCrosse (and the last-place Pontiac Grand Prix) but offers most of the same merits for a lower price. It rides comfortably and quietly, has a solidly-constructed interior, offers a large trunk, and did well in crash testing. But it also shares some of those cars’ faults, such as a relatively compact rear seat, mediocre gas mileage, and compromised agility. It outranks the roomier and less-expensive Chevrolet Malibu here for its relative lack of a cheap feel, but its flaws keep it behind many cars that are roomier and less expensive.

 

The Impala has a soft, comfortable, and absorbent ride, though it is prone to some highway-speed float. It handles safely, but it is larger than most of the other cars in this group, which does not help its cornering behavior. The steering is moderately responsive but is too light and lacks feedback. The standard 3.5-liter V6 offers adequate power, and a 3.9-liter V6 and 5.3-liter V8 are also available (above this price point). The car remains quiet except under acceleration, when the engine’s rough growl becomes somewhat intrusive. The car’s weight takes its toll on gas mileage.

 

Inside, the Impala’s front bucket seats offer plenty of space on fairly comfortable seats, but they are too low and flat. A front bench is also offered (pictured), but it will not realistically hold a third passenger. The rear is well-shaped and adequately comfortable, though the car has surprisingly little head and leg space for rear-seat occupants considering its exterior size. The interior is solidly constructed, much better than Chevrolet's smaller Malibu, with good panel fit and overall materials. The gauges are clear, and the instruments are large, well-placed, and easy to use. Drivers sit low, but comfortably enough, and have good visibility. Entry/exit is easy to the front, but the shape of the roof and the narrower footwells complicate rear seat access. The trunk is very large and well-shaped.

 

The Impala reviewed here came in at $19,866, about $700 more than the V6 Malibu but not as well-equipped. Torso-protecting side airbags and stability control are not offered, but the Impala does include an 8-way power driver’s seat, GM’s OnStar driver assistance system, a tire-pressure monitor, and automatic headlights.

 

Overall, the Impala offers many of the Buick LaCrosse’s benefits with a bit more engine noise and a less opulent interior, but with better gas mileage, more rear-seat space, better safety ratings, and an $1,100 discount. But the Impala still isn’t cheap, nor is it roomy, fuel-efficient, or agile. It’s a decent family sedan with a solid feel, but there are more well-rounded competitors.

 

NEXT PAGE

 

 

The Basics:

 

 Vehicle Reviewed:

 2007 Chevrolet Impala

 LS

 3.5-liter V6 (211 hp)

 4-speed automatic

 $19,866

 

  Pros:

-Ride

-Refinement

-Interior Quality

-Trunk Space

 

 Cons:

-Rear Seat Space

-Fuel Economy

 

 Overall: 6/10

Though generally competent, the Impala has no unique strong points to excuse its shortcomings.

 

  

IFCAR Home

Reviews

Pricing

Other Sources

Top Picks

Vehicle Info

About IFCAR

Contact IFCAR

© 2007, Institute For Consumer Automotive Research