Comparison Test: Inexpensive Family Sedans  
 

Introduction

Vehicle Details

25th Place

24th Place

23rd Place

22nd Place

21st Place

20th Place

19th Place

18th Place

17th Place

16th Place

15th Place

14th Place

13th Place

12th Place

11th Place

10th Place

9th Place

8th Place

7th Place

6th Place

5th Place

4th Place

3rd Place

1st Place
Evaluations


 

 

8th Place: Saturn Aura

  

The Camry and Aura are often compared, as they are the two newest midsize sedans from two of the largest automakers in the world, and because unlike the new-for-2007 entry from another major automaker (Chrysler, with its redesigned Sebring) they are both obviously competitive. Also obvious upon examination is that both have a lot to offer but have clear shortcomings and relatively high prices. Both share the issue of interior quality flaws, and the Aura has a relatively small rear seat to go against the Camry’s lackadaisical handling. Also notable is that they have very different feels, as the Camry is designed to be pleasant and inoffensive and the Aura to feel like a premium European car. But, as with the Camry, its flaws and its price are enough to hold it back in the rankings here.

 

The Aura has a somewhat firm, though comfortable and absorbent ride. It handles well, and the quick steering returns some feedback. But while the Aura feels very well-composed, it doesn’t have quite the same sporty character as a Mazda6. The standard V6 offers strong acceleration, and stays relatively quiet. Road noise is a bit excessive, however. Gas mileage isn’t bad for a powerful V6, but it doesn’t fare well against the group’s 4-cylinders.

 

Inside, the Aura’s front seats are firm and comfortable, but could use additional lateral support. The sloping roofline forces the rear seat to be mounted too low, and the cushion is a bit hard, but there is enough usable space for two adults to enjoy adequate comfort. The interior uses a mix of high and low-quality materials, and some panels don’t fit together well. The gauges are clear and the instrument layout is simple. Drivers sit comfortably, but rearward visibility is less than ideal. Rear seat access is complicated by the low-mounted seat and the sloping roofline. The trunk is adequately roomy.

 

The Aura reviewed here came in very well-equipped but at a rather high price for this group. (No de-contented base model is currently offered.) For $20,569, it includes GM’s OnStar assistance system, automatic headlights, a tire-pressure monitor, an 8-way power driver’s seat, and XM satellite radio.

 

Overall, the Aura is a competent but flawed car. For its strong acceleration, good ride/handling balance, and generally upscale feel, it’s worth a look in this class. However, priced on the high end of this group, its flaws are impossible to excuse enough to rank it higher here.

 

NEXT PAGE

 

 

The Basics:

 

 Vehicle Reviewed:

 2007 Saturn Aura

 XE

 3.5-liter V6 (224 hp)

 4-speed automatic

 $20,569

 

  Pros:

-Ride

-Handling

-Acceleration

 

 Cons:

-Price

 

 Overall: 7/10

The Aura has a premium feel and sound engineering, but also has too many flaws for its price.

 

 

 

  

IFCAR Home

Reviews

Pricing

Other Sources

Top Picks

Vehicle Info

About IFCAR

Contact IFCAR

© 2007, Institute For Consumer Automotive Research