Comparison Test: Premium Midsize Sedans  
 

Introduction

Vehicle Details
21st Place

20th Place
19th Place
18th Place
17th Place

16th Place

15th Place

14th Place

13th Place

12th Place

11th Place

10th Place

9th Place

8th Place

7th Place

6th Place

5th Place

4th Place

3rd Place

2nd Place

1st Place
Evaluations
 

 

1st Place: Honda Accord

 

The Accord is not as nice of a car as the Azera. If you’re looking for the best car in this price range regardless of price, go back to the second-place finisher. But the Accord is over $2,500 less, offers general excellence, and is more fun to drive than the Azera. It still isn’t inexpensive, but at this price point, it’s reasonable compared to comparably-equipped competitors, and offers a sufficient premium feel.

 

The Accord has a very comfortable ride, well-controlled and firm, though a bit less absorbent than other class leaders. As a result, it also handles very well. It is less agile than the lighter Acura TSX, but it has well-controlled body roll, a nimble feel, and responsive, accurate steering, making it more fun-to-drive than most competitors. The 3.0-liter V6 is more than capably quick, but cannot match several newer competitors. The engine remains smooth and quiet even under acceleration, but wind noise is audible. Fuel economy is good, but not outstanding by this class’s standards, but better than the Azera’s.

 

Inside, the Accord’s firm, comfortable front seats are mounted high enough, and are quite roomy and well-shaped. The rear isn’t as high or as spacious as some competitors’, but it is well-shaped to make the best of that, and is still quite comfortable overall. The interior is solidly constructed from high-quality materials, but isn’t as luxurious as the Azera or the 2007 Camry. The gauges are large and clear, and the large, well-placed instruments are very easy to use. Entry/exit would be easier with wider door openings, but the well-shaped roofline facilitates getting in and out. Drivers sit very comfortable, and have good visibility. The trunk is quite small, and the Accord oddly lacks a split-folding rear seat.

 

The Accord did very well in crash testing. It earned five stars for both the driver and for the front passenger in the NHTSA frontal crash test, and four stars for both the driver and for the rear passenger in the NHTSA side crash test. It was rated Best Pick in the IIHS offset crash test, and Good in the IIHS side crash test. Its head restraints were rated Poor, however.

 

The Accord reviewed here came in at $25,117. That’s not so impressive compared to the sub-$23,000 Sonata, but surprisingly it makes the Accord one of the group’s value leaders. At that price, it’s missing a power passenger’s seat, but is still well-equipped overall.

 

Overall, the Accord is a very impressive car. And unlike in lower price ranges, where the Accord is expensive while coming with only basic equipment, it stacks up very well on the value front against the strongest contenders for this first-place position (Hyundai Azera and 2007 Toyota Camry). With more luxury than the Hyundai Sonata, a lower price than those other two, and more driving enjoyment than either, it’s a winner.

 

 

The Basics:

 

 Vehicle Reviewed:

 2006 Honda Accord

 3.0-liter V6 (244 hp)

 5-speed automatic

 $25,117

 

  Pros:

-Interior Comfort

-Ride Comfort

-Refinement

-Acceleration

-Interior Quality

-Agility

-Safety Ratings

 

 Cons:

-Trunk Volume

 

 Overall:

New from Honda: a vehicle with both excellence and reasonable pricing.         

  

IFCAR Home

Reviews

Pricing

Other Sources

Top Picks

Vehicle Info

About IFCAR

Contact IFCAR

© 2006, Institute For Consumer Automotive Research