Comparison Test: Premium Midsize Sedans  
 

Introduction

Vehicle Details
21st Place

20th Place
19th Place
18th Place
17th Place

16th Place

15th Place

14th Place

13th Place

12th Place

11th Place

10th Place

9th Place

8th Place

7th Place

6th Place

5th Place

4th Place

3rd Place

2nd Place

1st Place
Evaluations
 

 

20th Place: Chrysler Sebring

 

In the 2006 model year, the Sebring is general mediocrity aged to an unacceptable level in this class. Virtually unchanged since 2001, it lacks the interior packaging and quality, ride comfort and refinement, and safety ratings to keep up with its competitors. The Sebring’s only bragging point is a relatively low price, but it’s not worth $23,000 even before you consider what else is available at the same price.

 

The Sebring rides quite stiffly, with road imperfections being poorly filtered. This firmness does not however give the car a more stable feel, it lacks control over larger bumps and at highway speeds. This comfort deficit at least pays off in the car’s handling; while it is not particularly fun to drive, body roll is at least capably controlled, the steering is accurate, and the car feels reasonably agile. The 2.7-liter V6 provides adequate acceleration, but falls near the back of the horsepower wars that have recently gripped this market class. It’s not quiet either, especially for a V6. Wind and road noise are clearly audible as well. Fuel economy is good for this class.

 

Inside, the front seats are comfortable enough, if a bit too low soft. The long cushion offers very good support, but taller occupants will want more headroom, particularly with the optional sunroof (included here). The rear is much less accommodating, with a low, small cushion, little headroom, and no head restraints. The dash is finished poorly even on the well-optioned model reviewed here, a splash of false aluminum or wood (both are offered) along the dash does not distract from the cheap, ill-fitting plastics that furnish virtually the entire interior. The gauges could use more contrast, and though the instruments are conveniently laid out, some could be higher. As noted, the car lacks rear head restraints, which somewhat improves rearward visibility, but the small windows and thick roof pillars still compromise visibility. Entry/exit is easy enough for front-seat occupants, but the sloped roofline, low seat, and rather narrow footwell complicate access to the rear seat. The trunk is adequately roomy, but the opening is too narrow.

 

The Sebring did well in its NHTSA frontal crash test, earning five out of five stars for both the driver and front passenger, but received a less-impressive three stars for both the driver and rear passenger in the NHTSA side crash test, without the optional side airbags. The IIHS rated the Sebring Acceptable, the third-highest of four ratings (virtually all competitors score the highest rating of Good however), but was Poor in their side-impact crash test. Its head restraints were also judged to be Acceptable, but only on seats with a power-recline feature (included here, other seats were rated Poor).

 

The Sebring reviewed here came in at a reasonable $23,297, but lacked such features as a power passenger’s seat, satellite radio, torso-protecting side airbags, and stability control.

 

Overall, the $23,000 midsize Sebring cannot be considered better in any major way even than some $18,000 compact cars, despite its larger engine and exterior dimensions. And with its lack of refinement, interior space and quality, and safety ratings, its relatively low price alone cannot make it competitive with other family sedans.  It beats the Grand Prix thanks to its lower price, but nothing else. The 2007 model year brings a much-needed redesign.

 

 

The Basics:

 

 Vehicle Reviewed:

 2006 Chrysler Sebring

 Limited

 2.7-liter V6 (200 hp)

 4-speed automatic

 $23,297

 

  Pros:

-Price

-Agility

-Trunk Space

-Fuel Economy

 

 Cons:

-Interior Comfort

-Ride Comfort

-Interior Quality

-Refinement

-Safety Ratings

 

 Overall:

The Sebring can’t do much that a good economy car can’t do better.

  

IFCAR Home

Reviews

Pricing

Other Sources

Top Picks

Vehicle Info

About IFCAR

Contact IFCAR

© 2006, Institute For Consumer Automotive Research