Comparison Test: Subcompact Wagons  
 

Introduction

Vehicle Details

9th Place

8th Place

7th Place

6th Place

5th Place

4th Place

3rd Place

2nd Place

1st Place
Evaluations


 

 

3rd Place: Honda Fit

 

The Fit offers impressive interior space for passengers and cargo, nimble handling, and excellent gas mileage, blended with competence in most other areas. What kept it from being the top economy car in this group was its uneconomical price of $16,565, which is above any of the others but the all-wheel-drive Suzuki and the premium-grade Volkswagen. It’s good, but it’s not that good, and the best economy car needs to be inexpensive.

 

The Fit has a rather firm but fairly comfortable ride. It is comfortable and controlled on smooth pavement and recovers quickly from bumps, but isn’t too absorbent. The suspension is clearly tuned more for handling, as the Fit corners very well with limited body roll and responsive steering with good-for-this-class feedback. It’s no sports car, despite that implication from some other reviews, but it is the closest of any of its generally acknowledged competition. The engine is smooth, but the car feels quite weak even by the standards of this group. Road noise is excessive. Gas mileage ties with the Scion xA to be the best in this group.

 

Inside, the Fit’s front seats are high, well-shaped, and fairly comfortable, but the padding is a bit thin. The rear seat is roomy and mounted high as well, and the seatback can recline, but the cushion itself is rather flat and hard. The interior is nice enough to look at, with attractive materials and tight-fitting trim pieces, but most plastics feel budget-grade. The gauges are attractive and clear, and the instruments are logically arrayed and easy to use. A telescoping steering wheel and/or adjustable pedals would improve the driving position, but neither are offered. Visibility is good, at least. Entry/exit is easy to the front and rear. There is more usable cargo space behind the rear seat than most of the others here, and the seats either fold flat easily or can have the cushion flip up against the seatback to turn the seating area into a deeper cargo well. When in use, the rear seats sit above the floor, opening up a bit of storage space beneath them. All in all, the Fit’s cargo space and versatility is a strong point in this group, especially considering its exterior size.

 

The Fit reviewed here came in at $16,565, which is its sticker price. Production has not kept up with demand since the car’s introduction, and nothing seems to be about to change, so expect the price to stay where it is for quite some time. At that price, it doesn’t come exceptionally well-equipped either, though it at least isn’t missing any essentials. The base model of the Fit lines up in price with most of the others in this group, but lacks the basics of cruise control and keyless entry, among other things included on this Sport model.

 

Overall, the Fit would have won this comparison if it were about $1,500 cheaper. But as it is, it remains too expensive to be considered the best economy car of the group. And its ride comfort, refinement, and power are lacking as well. But it’s roomy and practical, agile and fuel-efficient, and at least competent in most areas. It’s definitely worth a look, but not necessarily worth sticker price and a waiting list.

 

NEXT PAGE

 

 

The Basics:

 

 Vehicle Reviewed:

 2007 Honda Fit

 Sport

 1.5-liter I4 (109 hp)

 5-speed automatic

 $16,565

 

  Pros:

-Interior Space

-Fuel Economy

-Cargo Versatility

-Handling

 

 Cons:

-Price

-Acceleration

 

 Overall: 7/10

A very good economy car, but at un-economy prices and without a premium feel it isn’t the greatest economy choice.

 

  

IFCAR Home

Reviews

Pricing

Other Sources

Top Picks

Vehicle Info

About IFCAR

Contact IFCAR

© 2006, Institute For Consumer Automotive Research