|
While there are a few cars that are a good
choice for all, the rest of the marketplace is full neither of cars that are
designed for specific niches nor those that are just a cut below all around nor
those that represent a poor choice in practically any circumstance. The worst of
the latter vehicles are included here.
Select a vehicle category to jump to
its vehicle listings:
|
Economy Cars:
Small
sedans, coupes, and hatchbacks typically priced below $20,000. The
better models offer enough rear-seat room for adult comfort, comfortable
rides, good gas mileage, nimble handling, and solid crash-test scores.
These fall short of all or most of those standards. Station wagons are listed separately.
Economy Cars to Avoid:
Saturn Ion
Suzuki Forenza
Suzuki Reno
See also:
Economy Sedan Comparison Test
|
Family Sedans:
Midsize and large sedans with well-equipped versions priced below
$25,000. (Fully-loaded models, however, may extend past $30,000.) The
better models offer excellent crash-test ratings, very comfortable and
quiet rides, good acceleration and adequate fuel economy, lots of
safety, luxury, and convenience features, and roomy, high-quality
interiors. Some also offer sporty handling. These fall short of all or
most of those standards.
Family Sedans to Avoid:
Chrysler Sebring / Dodge
Avenger
Pontiac Grand Prix
See also:
Inexpensive Family Sedan Comparison Test
Premium Family Sedan Comparison Test
|
|
Large Mainstream Sedans:
Similar to family sedans in most respect, but many are more upscale and
most are appreciably larger and more expensive than an Honda Accord or
Toyota Camry. Roomy interiors, fair prices, comfortable rides, and
excellent crash test results are among the traditional criteria for this
class, but power, refinement, and luxury are also materializing as
important. These fall short of all or most of those standards.
Large Mainstream Sedans
to Avoid:
Chrysler 300 2.7-liter
Dodge Charger 3.5-liter
Ford Crown Victoria / Mercury Grand Marquis
See also:
Large Sedan Comparison Test
|
Entry-Lux Sedans:
Compact, midsize, and some large sedans priced from the high $20,000s to
past $40,000. Many are versions of less-expensive cars, the better of
those distinguish themselves well from their downmarket counterparts,
some are mainstream large sedans with added equipment and sufficient
luxury to compete with like-priced upscale-branded vehicles. Some focus
on isolation, others on sport. The better ones have comfortable and
quiet rides, high-quality interiors, many standard and optional safety,
convenience, and luxury features, top-notch safety ratings, and
comfortable front seating (some even have habitable rear quarters). The
better cars that focus specifically on either sport or luxury excel in
that area. These fall short of all or most of those standards.
Entry-Lux Sedans to
Avoid:
Jaguar X-Type
Lexus IS
Lincoln Zephyr
Lincoln Town Car
See also:
Entry-Lux Sedan Comparison Test
|
|
Luxury Sedans:
Midsize and large sedans that are priced from the low $40,000s past
$60,000. The best ones offer a blend of comfort, luxury, refinement, and
driving enjoyment, along with numerous safety, luxury, and convenience
features. The front and rear seats should both be roomy and comfortable.
These fall short of all or most of those standards.
Luxury Sedans to Avoid:
Jaguar S-Type
Lexus GS |
Ultra-Lux Sedans:
Large
sedans priced from the low $60,000s up past $100,000. An ultra-luxury
sedan should offer excellent passenger space and comfort for the front
and rear, an unflappable and nearly silent ride, and virtually any
possible luxury, safety, and convenience feature. Strong acceleration
and agile handling are also pluses. This car falls short of all or most
of those standards.
Ultra-Lux Sedans to
Avoid:
Volkswagen Phaeton
See also:
Ultra-Lux Sedan Comparison Test
|
|
Small Station Wagons:
Small
cars with a wagon body style. Some are conventional variants of standard
compact sedans, others are styled to conceal their roots. The better
ones offer the benefits of a typical economy car with much more cargo
space at a fairly small price premium. The Caliber falls short of most
of those standards, and the Outback Sport is simply an inferior and
pricier version of the Subaru Impreza wagon.
Small Wagons to Avoid:
Dodge Caliber
Subaru Outback Sport
See also:
Compact Wagon Comparison Test
|
Midsize Station Wagons:
Midsize cars with a wagon body style. This market segment has dwindled
with the popularity of the SUV, but the few models that remain offer
good gas mileage, passenger space, pricing, and cargo space. This model
falls short of most of those standards.
Midsize Wagons to Avoid:
Dodge Magnum V6
|
|
Entry-Lux Station
Wagons:
Compact and midsize cars with a wagon body style, a price in the $30,000
range, and a wide range of safety, luxury, and convenience features.
This always-small market segment has dwindled further with the
popularity of the SUV and crossover. This model falls short of all or
most of those standards.
Entry-Lux Wagons to
Avoid:
Jaguar X-Type
|
Luxury Station Wagons:
Midsize cars with a wagon body style, a price that ranges from around
$40,000 to $70,000, and a wide range of safety, luxury, and convenience
features. This always-small market segment has dwindled further with the
popularity of the SUV and crossover. There are no egregious choices
among the few available models.
|
|
Sporty Cars under
$20,000:
Any
car under $20,000 that is either especially fun-to-drive or marketed
with sporty pretensions. (All coupes/3-door hatchbacks automatically
qualify.) The best cars blend functionality with competitive
acceleration and enjoyable handling. These do not.
Sub-$20,000 Sporty Cars
to Avoid:
Chevrolet Cobalt/Pontiac G5 2.2-liter
Mitsubishi Eclipse
|
Sporty Cars,
$20,000-$30,000:
Any
car priced between $20,000 and $30,000 that is either especially
fun-to-drive or marketed with sporty pretensions. (All coupes/3-door
hatchbacks and convertibles automatically qualify.) The best cars blend
functionality with competitive acceleration and enjoyable handling.
These do not.
$20k-$30k Sporty Cars to
Avoid:
Chevrolet Monte Carlo V6
Chrysler Crossfire
Mitsubishi Eclipse
|
|
Sporty Cars,
$30,000-$40,000:
Any
car priced between $30,000 and $40,000 that is either especially
fun-to-drive or marketed with sporty pretensions. (All coupes/3-door
hatchbacks and convertibles automatically qualify.) The best cars blend
functionality with competitive acceleration and enjoyable handling. Some
level of luxury is also important at this price level. These fall short
of all or most of those standards.
$30k-$40k Sporty Cars to
Avoid:
Audi TT
Chrysler Crossfire |
Sporty Cars,
$40,000-$50,000:
Any
car priced between $40,000 and $50,000 that is either especially
fun-to-drive or marketed with sporty pretensions. (All coupes/3-door
hatchbacks and convertibles automatically qualify.) The best cars blend
functionality with competitive acceleration and enjoyable handling. Some
level of luxury is also important at this price level. These fall short
of all or most of those standards.
$40k-$50k Sporty Cars to
Avoid:
Audi TT
Chrysler Crossfire
|
|
Sporty Cars,
$50,000-$100,000:
Any
car priced between $50,000 and $100,000 that is either especially
fun-to-drive or marketed with sporty pretensions. (All coupes/3-door
hatchbacks and convertibles automatically qualify.) The best cars blend
functionality with competitive acceleration and enjoyable handling.
Luxury is on equal footing with sport in this price class. These fall
short of all or most of those standards.
$50k-$100k Sporty Cars
to Avoid:
Cadillac XLR
Lexus SC430
|
Sporty Trucks:
Any
SUV or pickup that is either especially fun to drive or marketed with
sporty pretensions. The relative lack of qualifiers restricts the
possibility of a price range, but the best ones combine functionality with
driving enjoyment for a reasonable price. There are no egregious choices
in this admittedly dubious class.
|
|
Compact SUVs:
Any
SUV under 185 inches long with a well-equipped version priced under
$25,000. The better models offer comfortable and flexible interiors,
safe handling, a comfortable and quiet ride, good safety ratings, and
reasonable gas mileage. These fall short of all or most of those
standards.
Compact SUVs to Avoid:
Jeep Compass
|
Midsize SUVs:
Any
SUV over 185 inches long with a well-equipped version priced under
$30,000. The better models offer comfortable and flexible interiors with
three rows of seats, safe handling, a comfortable and quiet ride,
excellent safety ratings, and reasonable gas mileage. These fall short
of all or most of those standards.
Midsize SUVs to Avoid:
Buick Rendezvous
Buick Rainier/ Chevrolet TrailBlazer
(except SS) /GMC Envoy
Isuzu Ascender
Jeep Grand Cherokee V6
Mitsubishi Montero
See
also:
Midsize SUV Comparison Test |
|
Large Mainstream SUVs:
Any
SUV over 75 inches wide with a well-equipped V8 version priced under
$40,000. The better models offer comfortable and flexible interiors with
three rows of seats, safe handling, a comfortable and quiet ride,
reasonable acceleration and towing capacity, and a great deal of cargo
space. There are no egregious choices in this class.
See also:
Large SUV Comparison Test
|
Entry-Lux SUVs:
Midsize SUVs priced from the mid-$30,000s up past $50,000. The better
models offer comfortable and flexible interiors with three rows of
seats, safe handling, a comfortable and quiet ride, excellent
acceleration, reasonable fuel economy, high-quality interiors, excellent
crash-test results, and lots of safety, convenience, and luxury
features. These fall short of all or most of those standards.
Entry-Lux SUVs to Avoid:
Saab 9-7X
Volkswagen Touareg
|
|
Luxury SUVs:
Midsize and large SUVs priced from the mid-$40,000s up towards $100,000.
The better models offer drive like comparably-priced luxury sedans with
more people and cargo space, some larger and some sportier than others.
In general, they are held to the same standard as luxury and
ultra-luxury sedans. These fall short of all or most of those standards,
or are insufficiently differentiated from mainstream-branded vehicles.
Luxury SUVs to Avoid:
Hummer H2
Infiniti QX56
Lexus LX470 |
Minivans:
The
best combination of passenger and cargo space, comfort, refinement,
luxury, fuel economy, and value on the market. The better models have
reasonable pricing, excellent safety, roomy front, rear, and third-row
seating, comfortable and quiet rides, safe handling, good interior
quality, and a fair amount of safety, luxury, and convenience features.
These fall short of all or most of those standards.
Minivans to Avoid:
Buick Terraza / Chevrolet Uplander / Saturn
Relay
Ford Freestar / Mercury Monterey
See also:
Minivan Comparison Test
|
|
Compact/Midsize Regular
and Extended Cab Pickups:
These
vehicles should be inexpensive, capable, and relatively fuel-efficient,
while delivering adequate road manners and interior comfort. There is
nothing egregious in this class.
|
Compact/Midsize Crew Cab
Pickups:
These
vehicles offer more interior space, comfort, and refinement than the
more work-centered regular and extended-cab pickups. They also almost
always come with larger engines, increasing towing capacity standards.
This model is more expensive than its identical twin with no benefit.
Models to Avoid:
Mitsubishi Raider
See also:
Midsize Pickup Comparison Test
|
|
Large Regular Cab
Pickups:
These
vehicles should be inexpensive, roomy, and capable, with better driving
dynamics and towing and payload capacities than compact models. There is
nothing egregious in this class.
|
Large Extended Cab and
Crew Cab Pickups:
These
vehicles should combine the traits of family vehicles and work trucks,
offering comfortable and quiet interiors, luxury, safety, and
convenience options, and smooth rides along with high payload and towing
capacities. This model is insufficiently differentiated from its
mainstream-branded sibling.
Models to Avoid:
Lincoln Mark LT
|
|